<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>World Energy Blog &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldenergyblog.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldenergyblog.com</link>
	<description>critique and commentary on world energy news...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:04:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>US Energy Policy: Good Is Not Good Enough</title>
		<link>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-energy-policy-good-is-not-good-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-energy-policy-good-is-not-good-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AKB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldenergyblog.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are a few articles related to the current legislation in the US Senate right now: A Real Bill for the Climate: Here&#8217;s a quick one that explains the situation in congress right now with the current energy bill and why it should be more of a climate bill than an energy bill. A Missed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-energy-policy-good-is-not-good-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US climate change policy stuck on China</title>
		<link>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-climate-change-policy-stuck-on-china/</link>
		<comments>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-climate-change-policy-stuck-on-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AKB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldenergyblog.com/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A NYTimes article from last month discusses the recent talks between China and the USA to see eye to eye on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The heart of the issue is that China will not commit to a specific GHG reduction quota and that the USA will not commit to enough reductions. Together, China and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-climate-change-policy-stuck-on-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
