<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>World Energy Blog &#187; Emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldenergyblog.com/tag/emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldenergyblog.com</link>
	<description>critique and commentary on world energy news...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:07:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>US Energy Policy: Good Is Not Good Enough</title>
		<link>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-energy-policy-good-is-not-good-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-energy-policy-good-is-not-good-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AKB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldenergyblog.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are a few articles related to the current legislation in the US Senate right now: A Real Bill for the Climate: Here&#8217;s a quick one that explains the situation in congress right now with the current energy bill and why it should be more of a climate bill than an energy bill. A Missed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-energy-policy-good-is-not-good-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on US-China Emissions</title>
		<link>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/more-on-us-china-emissions/</link>
		<comments>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/more-on-us-china-emissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 22:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AKB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldenergyblog.com/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did a bit of analysis on a set of data in the new Annual Energy Review 2008 (released June 2009). The Review is created by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) &#8211; the statistical agency of the US Department of Energy. Although there is a lot of information about energy production and consumption in this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/more-on-us-china-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US climate change policy stuck on China</title>
		<link>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-climate-change-policy-stuck-on-china/</link>
		<comments>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-climate-change-policy-stuck-on-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AKB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldenergyblog.com/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A NYTimes article from last month discusses the recent talks between China and the USA to see eye to eye on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The heart of the issue is that China will not commit to a specific GHG reduction quota and that the USA will not commit to enough reductions. Together, China and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://worldenergyblog.com/2009/08/us-climate-change-policy-stuck-on-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

